Thursday, January 26, 2012
Othello - Iago at the end of Act III
Othello - theme
Othello - characters
Question:
"Identify the protagonist(s) and antagonist(s). Are there any foil characters? What dramatic functions are served by the various minor characters? Do they shed light on the actions or motives of the major characters? Do they advance the plot by eliciting actions by others? Do they embody ideas or feelings that illuminate the major characters or the movement of the plot?"
Answer:
The protagonists in "Othello" are the characters of Othello, Cassio, and Roderigo. Roderigo- even though he is trying to go against Cassio and Othello- would be considered a protagonist because he does those things under the influence of Iago's deception. Which brings me to the antagonist, Iago. He is against pretty much every other character in the play and is solely focused on bringing down others in order for personal gain and revenge.
Roderigo could be considered a foil character to Iago because Roderigo values love the most and Iago manipulates those who are around him to accomplish goals that will only benefit himself. Also, he treats his wife like dirt saying, "Sir, would she give you so much of her lips as her tongue she oft bestows on me, you'll have enough" (II i 109). For this same reason, Cassio is a foil character to Iago as well. Cassio greets Desdemona by saying, "Grettings my lady, and may God always be with you" (II i 90). He then proceeds to embrace and kiss her.
In Act I, the Duke - a minor character- shows Othello's integrity and leadership by calling him to help with the war and believing his statement about his marriage to Desdemona. He says to Barbantio, "Your son-in-law is far more fair than black" (I iii 286). This shows that Othello is an honestly good man. Emilia shows that Iago is not a good husband based on the conversation they had with Desdemona about women in general and the compliments (or lack thereof) that Iago would give them.
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Popular Mechanics
Alright, this was creepy and sad. But I did not really understand why we read it. I saw no significance. I know I say that quite a bit, but for this story, it is actually true. So I'm glad that we are going over this one in class. The part I did not like in this story was obviously the ending. I think it is an awful thought to think that two people would be so angry with one another that they tore their own baby apart... literally. I'm sure this is not the first time this has happened. Maybe people haven't actually ripped their baby apart, but I'm sure deaths of small infants have to do with parents who get into angry fights. I honestly don't really know what else to say on this story because I don't see any literary techniques except the lack of quotation marks in the dialogue.
You're Ugly, Too
Something that caught my eye in this short story was the costumes that some people were wearing. In some ways, I think they kind of symbolized particular things in their lives. For example, Evan was a housemaid and she was going to be married soon. I think that that could foreshadow possibly what she will be doing with her life. The man who was dressed as a naked lady stood out. He just got divorced and so he lacked having a woman in his life, so he compensated with the costume. The man who was a cross dresser might have really wanted to be a woman. (OK, that one is a weak one) Finally, Zoe went as a bone head. I think this describes her so well. First, she makes her costume as a joke. This is kind of how she has lived her whole life: as one giant joke. Second, the bone head symbolizes the kind of person she is. She doesn't really get things as well as others and is sort of dense. She does not understand social situations as well as most people do and is extremely awkward. So the bone head embodies who she is as a character.
The Drunkard
The biggest thing for me from this short story was the irony. The obvious irony was when the son got drunk. This whole time the father had been getting drunk while other people had to take care of him. However, this time around, the son stole the father's alcohol in hopes that he would not get drunk. Contrary to his (the son's) belief was that HE ended up getting drunk. This worked out in his favor though. The father saw a mirror image to what he was like when he is drunk and he was the one taking care of his son now. This turned his point of view around and eventually aided in him quitting the alcohol.
Another irony that someone in my small group mentioned was that maybe there was some sort of parallel between the funeral and the alcoholic tendencies. The mother was hinting at the father drinking himself to death. The irony comes to play when he was getting drunk at funerals. I thought that was kind of interesting and I'm not really sure if that's an actual irony of the story or not.
The Lottery
In this story, we were told to focus on its point of view. The point of view in this story was different than the other stories for the most part. It was third person objective point of view. The narrator had no personal attachment to the story and I think that sort of paralleled with the characters. Once they knew who was going to be stoned each year, they let their feelings and connections quickly diminish as their brutality and barbaric nature took place. Another thing about the narrator's importance was that they allowed the townspeople to tell the story. And since it did not focus on one character, a wider picture was given to show how widespread this tradition was to the townsfolk. While reading, there were not hints or anything really given to foreshadow the ending like most stories that involve a narrator being a character within the story. This was important and kind of gave a surprise ending.
Also, I thought it was kind of ironic how the lady stoned was late and almost did not show up. What if she hadn't been in attendance at this annual sacrifice?